As befitting the end of a year as shitty as 2016 was, this past Christmas saw the sad death of Carrie Fisher at the age of just 60. The actress has been mourned by millions of fans around the world, though her final performances in “Catastrophe” and upcoming “Star Wars” sequel “The Last Jedi” remained to be seen (the former came on Amazon last week, and Fisher was great in it).

Aside from their grief, it left “Star Wars” backers an issue: Fisher and General Leia had been a key part of the new “Star Wars” movies, and while she’d completed filming on “The Last Jedi,” the actress would have reprised her role for a sixth time in Colin Trevorrow’s “Star Wars Episode IX,” which is set to shoot at the beginning of next year. Rumors initially stated that the actress would be digitally recreated for the new film, but Lucasfilm quickly denied those rumors, with the company’s head Kathleen Kennedy confirming last month that Fisher wouldn’t be in the ninth film.

READ MORE: Rian Johnson Asked J.J. Abrams To Make Sure R2-D2 Was With Rey At The End Of ‘The Force Awakens’

And now, Kennedy tells Entertainment Weekly that it had an understandably large impact on the story. “Obviously with Carrie having passed away, it shook everybody,” Kennedy told the outlet. “We pretty much started over.”

It’s a tough situation, but it seems like the right approach: a digital double would have felt ghoulish and exploitative, and lightly altering whatever scripting had been done for the new movie to work around Leia’s absence would have just pointed out the elephant in the room. Bob Iger has said that “The Last Jedi” won’t be altered to reflect Fisher’s passing, so we imagine that Leia will pass away some time after the events of “The Last Jedi,” with full tribute paid at the start of “Episode IX.” But perhaps Trevorrow and co-writer Derek Connolly have something else in mind… Fisher’s last performance will be seen on December 15th, 2017.

  • Drock

    Im sorry I don’t get how it’s ok to bring back Cushing 25 years after he died, but it’s not ok to bring back an actress who had every intention of being in this film. Seems backward to me

    • red-bones

      I totally agree, and I don’t think any fan would be outraged by them using a digital double, I really wish they would use one, even if she wasn’t in it much, just so we could have completed story arch for Leia

    • KingofRock

      Because it’s too soon.

      • Drock

        It wasn’t too soon for Paul Walker. It’s not like they’re trying to make a comedy about her death. I get that what your saying IS probably the reason , but I don’t think it makes sense

  • BeaveVillage

    We are going to get an Episode IX that was never intended…. my goodness. Wouldn’t it be better to just recreate Carrie Fisher in computer graphics and use voice morphing for her voice? Even if it takes another year for IX to come out, why change the story to start with a death of one of the most loved characters in the entire saga?